
When I first read that headline I thought, “great just one more game some yahoo’s (yes I actually use words like ‘yahoo’) pirated for the PC.” Much to my surprise though I realized someone pirated a copy for the 360. After months and months of executives telling us that the reason the PC market is in decline is because of piracy we see that the same can be said of the Xbox market.
The problem isn’t the system, the problem is the people. But I’m not going to write about why piracy is no different than theft. And why piracy is most certainly immoral. What I’m more interested in today is the vast number of gamers who are not pirates, yet sit around saying, “I never would pirate anything, but I understand why they pirate it.”
How can you hold such a position?
Let me ask a simple question: Do you believe software piracy is wrong?
If you do, why do you support it?
If you don’t, why don’t you actively engage in it?
I hear a lot of justifications for piracy from the “I would never pirate, but I understand…” crowd. Yet none of them are particularly satisfying. If Microsoft is the epitome of greed, how is being greedy ourselves going to teach them a lesson? If EA is evil for using DRM, how is stealing their game going to solve the DRM issue?
We will never change the structure of DRM and corporate pricing if our answer is to steal. We need a better solution. Martin Luther King Jr taught civil disobedience, but he emphasized nonviolent methods. He didn’t advocate breaking into “the man’s” bank and stealing “his” money. He offered wisdom, visible protests, and boycotts. While the issues of the computer industry can never be compared to the serious stakes in the Civil Rights movement, King knew that repaying violence with violence was not a winnable solution.
That’s why I don’t see how stealing to prevent piracy will ever improve the situation. I don’t like DRM any more than anyone else. But as the cliche goes, two wrongs don’t make a right.
October 17th, 2008 |